But of course, the definition of 'unjust' depends on on one's point of view. Society defines 'just', and convincing Society that it is in error is the hard part. Without the support of Society, 'unjust' will remain 'just' and the cause is lost.
The larger question is, by what means can Society's attitudes best be changed? Education, exposure, confrontation?
Nudists/naturists tend not to be activists. There are many reasons for this aside from the fact that most folks, nudist or not, are not very activistic in general. We tend to be content to vote Party and avoid active participation in support of our views. That's human nature.
We who like to run around naked with friends and strangers have extra of reasons not to be very public about our activities, let alone step out up front and declare/defend our lifestyle.
These topfreedom folks are few in numbers and have their own agenda unrelated to social nudism, but they do have the cajones to do it! And they seem to be making inroads.
We could use more of this type of social nudist activism, but our major organizations instead keep a low profile and try to avoid the limelight. Without their support, it would be foolish for individuals to attempt to promote mainstream social nudism and expect any kind of respect or credibility from Society. Individual nudists appearing in the media are labelled as 'kooks' or 'weirdos' in the milder terms; 'perverts' and 'creeps' is more common.
Without loud and vocal support from legitimate nudist/naturist organizations, that's all those folks will ever be; individual kooks and not representative of tens of millions of like-minded people! The topfreedom groups are also considered to be 'kooks', but by persistence they are getting their message across, and getting Press exposure and support of their views.
Are we? You know the answer to that.